The conservative organization that sold out to Trump (Opinion)

Republican Charlie Dent is a former US congressman from Pennsylvania who served as chairman of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Military Construction, Veterans Affairs and Related Agencies from 2015 until 2018. He is currently a CNN political commentator and a senior policy adviser at DLA Piper, a global law firm. The views expressed in this commentary are his own. View more opinion on CNN.

(CNN)Just when I thought politics could not get any stranger, I turned on the television this weekend. After a week punctuated by daily presidential absurdities -- from insulting the Danish prime minister, to escalating the trade war with China, to attacking the Fed Chairman Jerome Powell -- an organization I thought would stand in strong opposition to President Donald Trump caved under the weight of his power.

In a Sunday interview with Chuck Todd, David McIntosh, president of the Club for Growth, a fiscal conservative organization that donates heavily to congressional campaigns, proclaimed his support of President Donald Trump's re-election, calling him "a free-market conservative." For reference, this is the same organization that endorsed Texas Sen. Ted Cruz in the 2016 presidential election -- and not the man who would win the Republican nomination and ultimately the White House.

So, where does one begin to unpack this jaw-dropping hypocrisy? For years, the Club for Growth's leaders designated themselves the chiefs of the conservative purity police and staunch defenders of free markets, excoriating Republicans deemed insufficiently doctrinaire. In fact, they regularly instigated and launched primary challenges against Republicans of all stripes whom they designated as heretics to their righteous cause.

Their rigid, inflexible views sometimes resulted in the election of Democrats in districts or states that should easily have gone Republican. Take Sharron Angle , who, with Club For Growth support, emerged from relative obscurity as the Republican nominee for Senate in Nevada and then lost miserably to Democratic Sen. Harry Reid.

If the Club for Growth had a motto back then, it would have been this: Purity over victory.

The Club's political malfeasance when I first ran for Congress in 2004 and in succeeding election cycles cannot be overstated. By actively helping to nominate otherwise unviable candidates in crowded Republican primaries, the Club advanced dangerously weak and often extreme general election candidates in solid Republican districts. This forced the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) to waste precious resources holding these safe Republican districts when these funds would have better been spent supporting swing district incumbent Republicans or supporting Republican candidates challenging vulnerable incumbent Democrats.

politically destructive behavior As a leader of the Tuesday Group, a collection of center-right Republican members of Congress, I was all too familiar with the Club's politically destructive behavior and judgments. At times things got so bad with the Club for Growth that I and many other Republicans derisively referred to them as the Club for Democrats. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) had no better ally than the Club for Growth.

even retweetinglater referred Fast forward to today. By endorsing Trump as "a free-market conservative," the Club for Growth, like too many others, has sacrificed whatever principles they once espoused for the shameful embrace of a man who has very few fixed policy positions. Cruz represented the Club in its purist form, always ready to condemn political blasphemers as RINOs (Republicans in name only) and capitulators. Just like Cruz -- who Trump disgracefully attacked, even retweeting an outrageous tweet comparing a glamorous photo of Melania Trump with an awful photo of Heidi Cruz (a decision he later referred to as a mistake) -- the Club for Growth melted at the altar of Trump, likely for the sake of political expediency.

The Club's new motto should be: Principle be damned; it's all about loyalty to the man.

while excusingaspirational "zero-zero" policy In defending the Club for Growth's endorsement of Trump, McIntosh cited the President's tax and deregulatory policies, while excusing his growth stunting, nakedly protectionist trade policies. What's more, he defended the President's incoherent and growth-destroying trade policy with an "art of the deal" bromide and an aspirational "zero-zero" policy , which refers to the administration's desire, someday, for zero tariffs and zero subsidies.

friendfoeprovides subsidiesroutinely labeled In fact, Trump has offered just the opposite of zero tariffs, zero subsidies; he imposes tariffs on friend and foe alike and provides subsidies (relief) to proud farmers suffering under Chinese retaliation. I remember a time not long ago when Republicans like me supported free trade and attempted to cut and limit agricultural subsidies, as we were cheered on by the Club for Growth and others who routinely labeled farm subsidies as corporate welfare.

Not anymore. Sycophancy is the order of the moment, as it's more important to be on the Trump train no matter the offense or wanton cruelty. What a shameful state of affairs this has become for those of us who joined the party of Abraham Lincoln and thought character counted for something.

Source: CNN

Powered by NewsAPI.org

Keywords:

Conservatism in the United States • Donald Trump • Republican Party (United States) • Charlie Dent • United States House of Representatives • Pennsylvania • Chairman • United States House Committee on Appropriations • United States congressional subcommittee • United States Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies • CNN • Pundit • Foreign policy • DLA Piper • International law • Law firm • CNN • CNN • Trade war • China • Donald Trump • Chuck Todd • David M. McIntosh • Club for Growth • Fiscal conservatism • United States Congress • Political campaign • Advocacy • Donald Trump • United States presidential election, 2004 • Free market • Conservatism • Texas • United States Senate • Ted Cruz • United States presidential election, 2016 • Republican Party (United States) • White House • Hypocrisy • Club for Growth • Conservatism • Virtue • Free market • Republicanism • Doctrine • Fact • Republicanism • Heresy • United States presidential election, 2016 • Democratic Party (United States) • Republican Party (United States) • Sharron Angle • Club for Growth • Republican Party (United States) • United States Senate • Nevada • Democratic Party (United States) • United States Senate • Harry Reid • Club for Growth • United States Congress • Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016 • General election • Candidate • National Republican Congressional Committee • National Republican Congressional Committee • Safe seat • Swing (politics) • Incumbent • Republican Party (United States) • Republican Party (United States) • Incumbent • Democratic Party (United States) • Tuesday Group • Centre-right politics • Republicanism • Club for Growth • Republican Party (United States) • Democratic Party (United States) • Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee • Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee • Club for Growth • Fast forward • Donald Trump • Free market • Conservatism • Club for Growth • Value (ethics) • Republican In Name Only • Twitter • Melania Trump • Heidi Cruz • Club for Growth • Ejection seat • Club for Growth • Donald Trump • David M. McIntosh • President of the United States • Tax • Deregulation • Public policy • Stunted growth • Protectionism • Public policy • President of the United States • Foreign trade of the United States • Trump: The Art of the Deal • Tariff • Tariff • Tariff • History of China • Republican Party (United States) • Free trade • Agricultural subsidy • Club for Growth • Agricultural subsidy • Corporate welfare • Sycophancy • Donald Trump • Abraham Lincoln •