KNOW THEY SELF AND EXPERIENCE IT!

Do you truly have to perform substantial compensation, self reflection and disavow the world to know yourself? For what reason would it be advisable for you to for purpose all that you need to know yourself and that happiness which as of now lives inside you? There are a great many individuals who have repudiated everything to find their genuine Self. However, have they discovered their internal identity? No, a couple of sages have had the option to open the response to the inquiry "Who am I?" However, that secret remaining parts covered in the hearts of these spiritualists. In any case, there have been not many people who have passed down this experience to other people. The cycle of Self Realization is undoubtedly extremely simple and only the legitimate direction is required. 

To start this journey to know yourself, we should start by taking a gander at a discussion between an Enlightened individual and a searcher about what truly has a place with us and what doesn't

To know yourself, you need to isolate I and My 

Dadashri: right now, do you relate to the 'My'? Is the 'I' alone, or is it with 'My'? 

Examiner: 'My' is consistently there. 

Dadashri: What are generally the things that fall under 'My'? 

Examiner: My home and all the things inside my home. 

Dadashri: Are those things yours? To whom does the spouse have a place? 

Examiner: She is likewise mine. 

Dadashri: And these youngsters? 

Examiner: They are likewise mine. 

Dadashri: And this watch? 

Examiner: That is likewise mine. 

Dadashri: And these hands, whose hands are these? 

Examiner: They are likewise mine.

Dadashri: Then you will say "My head, my body, my feet, my ears, my eyes." All these pieces of your body fall under 'My'. Yet, at that point who is the individual that is saying this word "My?" Who is the one that says, "Every one of these things are mine?" Have you ever contemplated that? When you say "My name is David," (supplant your own name with David) and afterward you pivot and say, "I'm David" do you not think there is a logical inconsistency in this? 

Examiner: Yes, I suspect as much. 

Dadashri: You are 'David' at the present time. In this 'David' there is both 'I' and 'My'. They resemble the two railroad lines of 'I' and 'My'; they generally run together at this point they are consistently discrete. They are consistently resemble and never become one. Notwithstanding this you trust them to be one. This is because of the obliviousness or ignorance of your actual character. Having gotten this, separate the 'My'. Hold every one of that goes under 'My' aside. For instance, "My heart," keep your heart on one side. What different things do we need to isolate from this body? 

Examiner: The feet and all the receptors. 

Dadashri: Yes, the five gnanendriyas (organs of discernment) and five karmendriyas (organs of activity) and all the other things. Moreover, do you say, "My psyche," or "I'm mind?" 

Examiner: We say, "My brain." 

Dadashri: Do you additionally not say, "My knowledge?" 

Examiner: Yes.

Dadashri: And "My chitt (the part of inward vision and past information in the brain)?" 

Examiner: Yes. 

Dadashri: Then do you say, "My pride," or do you say, "I'm vanity?" 

Examiner: My selfishness. 

Dadashri: So even selfishness isn't a piece of you. By saying "My vanity," you will have the option to isolate that as well, however you don't know about different parts that fall under 'my' and that is the reason you can't make a total partition. Your mindfulness has restrictions. You know about just the sthool (net) segments, past which there are sookshma (inconspicuous) segments. The unobtrusive segments likewise should be isolated, after which there are two additional degrees of nuance, sookshmatar (subtler) and sookshmatum (subtlest), which additionally should be removed. Just a Gnani Purush (Enlightened One) can accomplish a detachment at these theoretical levels. Is it unrealistic to isolate the two? In the event that you continue deducting 'My' from 'I', at each progression and at each level, and put all the things that fall under 'My' on one side, at that point what will remain? 

Examiner: The 'I'. 

Dadashri: That 'I', is correctly what you are. Also, that is the 'I' that you need to figure it out.

Questioner: After such a separation am I to understand that whatever is left over is who I really am? Is that the Real I?

Dadashri: Yes, whatever remains after the separation, is your Real Self. ‘I’ is the Real You. Should you not inquire about this? Is this method of separating the ‘I’ from ‘My,’ not simple?

Questioner: It appears to be simple, but how are we going to make the separation at the sookshmatar and sookshmatam levels? Without a Gnani, this is not possible, right?

Dadashri: Yes. That is what the Gnani Purush (Enlightened One) does for you. That is why I say separate ‘I’ and ‘My’ with the ‘Gnani’s separator.’ What do all the teachers of our scriptures call this separator?

They call it 'bhed Gnan.' It is the Science (knowledge) of separation. How are you going to take away the ‘My’ without this Science? You do not have the precise knowledge of what comes under ‘I’ and what comes under ‘My.’ Bhed Gnan means, “I am totally separate from everything that is mine.” It is only through meeting a Gnani Purush that one acquires this science of separation.

Is it not simple once this separation between the ‘I’ and the ‘My’ is made? Does the Science of Self-Realization not become simple this way? Otherwise, in this day and age, one can go on reading the scriptures to the point of exhaustion and still not attain Self-Realization.

"The world is the puzzle itself. It has puzzled itself. God has not created this puzzle. There are two viewpoints to solve this puzzle, one relative viewpoint and one real viewpoint. Real is permanent, relative is temporary. All these relatives are temporary adjustments and You are permanent." HERE IS THE PRODUCT LINK

~Param Pujya Dadashri