Striking Down ACA Would Weaken Medicare - 3 minutes read
Striking Down ACA Would Weaken Medicare
Medicare beneficiaries, providers, and plans could face severe harm if the federal courts allow a district court decision striking down the Affordable Care Act (ACA) to stand. As we noted earlier today, a federal court of appeals will hear oral arguments tomorrow on whether to uphold the decision.
The ACA affected many aspects of Medicare, and invalidating the entire law would call all of them into question. In particular, the ACA altered Medicare’s annual payment updates to hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, and certain other health care providers, as well as payments to Medicare Advantage health plans. If the district court’s decision stands, it’s unclear whether the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services could continue paying providers and plans or would first have to establish new regulations resetting all of these payment rates.
Beyond the immediate uncertainty and confusion, letting the decision stand could jeopardize the ACA’s Medicare improvements, including:
If the ACA were struck down, the courts might give the President and Congress time to enact a new law to take its place. But in the current political environment, an agreement between the House, Senate, and President could prove difficult to achieve. At the very least, Medicare beneficiaries, providers, and plans would face heightened uncertainty, and at least some of the ACA’s Medicare improvements would likely be lost.
Source: Cbpp.org
Powered by NewsAPI.org
Keywords:
Strike action • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act • Medicare (United States) • Medicare (United States) • Health professional • Federal judiciary of the United States • United States district court • Precedent • Strike action • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act • Today (U.S. TV program) • United States courts of appeals • Oral argument in the United States • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act • Medicare (United States) • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act • Medicare (United States) • Nursing home care • Health professional • Medicare Advantage • Health insurance • United States district court • Judgment (law) • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services • Regulation • Judgment (law) • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act • Medicare (United States) • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act • Judicial review • Court • President of the United States • United States Congress • Time (magazine) • Law • Politics • Contract • United States House of Representatives • United States Senate • President of the United States • Medicare (United States) • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act • Medicare (United States) •
Medicare beneficiaries, providers, and plans could face severe harm if the federal courts allow a district court decision striking down the Affordable Care Act (ACA) to stand. As we noted earlier today, a federal court of appeals will hear oral arguments tomorrow on whether to uphold the decision.
The ACA affected many aspects of Medicare, and invalidating the entire law would call all of them into question. In particular, the ACA altered Medicare’s annual payment updates to hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, and certain other health care providers, as well as payments to Medicare Advantage health plans. If the district court’s decision stands, it’s unclear whether the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services could continue paying providers and plans or would first have to establish new regulations resetting all of these payment rates.
Beyond the immediate uncertainty and confusion, letting the decision stand could jeopardize the ACA’s Medicare improvements, including:
If the ACA were struck down, the courts might give the President and Congress time to enact a new law to take its place. But in the current political environment, an agreement between the House, Senate, and President could prove difficult to achieve. At the very least, Medicare beneficiaries, providers, and plans would face heightened uncertainty, and at least some of the ACA’s Medicare improvements would likely be lost.
Source: Cbpp.org
Powered by NewsAPI.org
Keywords:
Strike action • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act • Medicare (United States) • Medicare (United States) • Health professional • Federal judiciary of the United States • United States district court • Precedent • Strike action • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act • Today (U.S. TV program) • United States courts of appeals • Oral argument in the United States • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act • Medicare (United States) • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act • Medicare (United States) • Nursing home care • Health professional • Medicare Advantage • Health insurance • United States district court • Judgment (law) • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services • Regulation • Judgment (law) • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act • Medicare (United States) • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act • Judicial review • Court • President of the United States • United States Congress • Time (magazine) • Law • Politics • Contract • United States House of Representatives • United States Senate • President of the United States • Medicare (United States) • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act • Medicare (United States) •