Video Hosting Platforms: Which Is Best for Your Business?

Google “video hosting platforms,” and you’ll get about 50 million results, along with several paid ads. How do you choose the platform that suits your needs?

There’s no single answer. The best video hosting platform varies business by business, depending on factors like:

Here’s a breakdown of the key features—and drawbacks—for eight popular video hosting platforms.

YouTube is an obvious and popular choice. You don’t pay to host videos on YouTube, nor do you need a license to create your own library of publicly available videos. Simply sign up using your Google account, create a channel, and upload your video files.

YouTube shines when it comes to brand awareness. It’s the second largest search engine in the world, and content from their platform reaches more 18–49 year-olds than any broadcast or cable TV network.

(“YouTuber” is now the dream job for 34% of children—beating traditional roles like athletes, musicians, lawyers, doctors, or actors.)

Since Google owns YouTube, videos rank highly in Google SERPs. Many occupy the Featured Snippet box, with snippets selected algorithmically. Here’s an example for “how to tie shoelaces fast”:

The basics of SEO (with some adjustments) apply to YouTube videos as well, giving YouTube publishers a chance to drive more awareness on Google and within YouTube.

All that said—YouTube has its downsides. The interface is designed to keep people on the platform. (The average mobile viewing rates are 40 minutes per session.) Suggested videos encourage people to increase their watch time not just on your channel but on the platform as a whole.

For example, my personal recommendations are a mix of business and pleasure. That makes it difficult to keep people focused on what you want them to do—like visit your website. As a result, YouTube works less well for engaging and converting users who are further down the funnel.

Recommendations can also be more than a distraction—they can highlight competitor offerings. As Kasey Bayne of DataTrue notes, “I love YouTube for the audience, but don’t love how they can show competitor or off-brand videos as suggestions afterwards.”

DailyMotion reports 300 million active users; they watch more than 3.5 billion videos per month. Those figures look impressive upon first glance.

But DailyMotion’s geographic distribution of users doesn’t mirror YouTube, especially within the United States. Just 138 million video views happen in the United States despite a population of 329 million (0.42 views per person).

Compare that to views in other countries, like Turkey, which averages 1.13 views per person, or France, where Daily Motion is located, which averages 7.13 views per person. (According to SimilarWeb, only 15.7% of all DailyMotion traffic comes from the United States.)

Like YouTube, you can monetize DailyMotion videos with in-stream advertisements. (Enabling ads is optional.) But the smaller audience—and more intrusive ads—reduce the potential for profitability and user enjoyment.

Indeed, DailyMotion viewers have expressed frustration at the overload of ads:

DailyMotion is another distribution option for media companies seeking to monetize content, especially if they’re located in one of the platform’s top countries. Beyond that, the use case is less compelling.

Pricing: Free, regardless of upload volume. Video files are limited to 60 minutes. (There are time-based upload limitations to limit spam.)

JW Player is often cited as an alternative to YouTube. In fact, JW Player was the technology that ran the earliest version of YouTube. It has continued to offer technical capabilities at the forefront of online video.

For companies who live stream regularly, JW Player can host the original video and simulcast it to Facebook Live. That allows some to escape the trap of hosting videos on Facebook, which locks content into the platform.

JW Player also offers real-time audience analytics, broken down by:

(In comparison, Facebook Live shows overview metrics like minutes viewed, average percentage completion, and unique viewers.)

The platform also hosts video using HTML5, which promises superfast download speed. This helps retain the 80% of online users who will click away if a video stalls while loading.

The technical features of JW Player have attracted enterprise-level publishers (e.g. Fox, BBC, Vice, Univision) who have the development resources to take advantage of JW Player.

Pricing: If you’re a small business, plans start at $12/month, with a maximum of 50,000 video plays. Anything over that falls into the Business plan, charged at $50/month for up to 150,000 plays.

Alternatively, there’s a six-month Developers Plan, whereby you get access to all features except live streaming. The plan targets data scientists and video engineers.

Wistia has been around since 2008. While it began as a hosting platform for individual videos, it has expanded its offerings.

The recent introduction of their “Channels” feature allows website owners to create a series of related videos and display the collection on their website—no coding required.

Here’s how Nextiny’s channel appears on their website:

Users can customize the look of a channel (e.g. video placement, landing page content), and—unlike YouTube—Wistia’s channels have no “recommended videos” or unwanted branding (for paid users).

Wistia’s analytics can help connect the dots between video consumption and conversions. They include features like engagement graphs and video-based heatmaps, and also integrate with Google Analytics and several CRMs.

Wistia has a paid upgrade for multilingual, searchable captions. Once synced with your video, Captions are interactive. Viewers can search captions and jump to a specific point in the video by clicking the text. (The automated captions may require editing.)

Of course, with Wisita, you must create the audience for your videos—there’s no inherent distribution network (unlike YouTube). You’ll get zero views unless you’re driving people to pages on your website with the embedded video.

Pricing: It’s free to host up to three videos, but you’ll have the Wistia branding overlayed on your content. You’ll need to upgrade to a Pro plan (starting from $99/month) for up to 10 videos and to remove the branding. Additional videos are $0.25 each.

Vimeo allows users to embed videos on their website (like Wistia). It works especially well for content that’s gated behind a form fill or paywall.

Vimeo can deliver video passwords within purchase confirmations while keeping content hidden from non-purchasers and search engines. It’s why Chelsea Baldwin of Business Bitch uses the platform:

CXL’s own Kyle Brodeur, who manages thousands of videos for CXL Institute courses, likes it for similar reasons:

David Peterson, who uses Vimeo for HealthMarkets’ video hosting, offers an example of what “nimble” is for them:

Also similar to Wisita, Vimeo’s benefits focus on the technical aspects of video hosting, not distribution (unless you’re planning to promote a show or film).

A note of caution: Both an article and a number of reviews state that, after upgrading to a paid account, any attempt to revert to a free account will remove videos from the site:

Pricing: Start using Vimeo free with their Starter plan. You can upload up to 10 videos per day, or 500MB per week. Plans then depend on storage: 5GB per week is $7/month; 20GB per week is $20/month; unlimited is $50/month.

Vidyard allows businesses to create personalized videos at scale. As Vidyard’s Jesse Arris pitched it:

Arris also highlighted that Vidyard is “the only major video hosting platform with a native Salesforce integration.” You can also connect HubSpot, Marketo, Act-On, Zendesk, and Mailchimp accounts.

What does “video personalization” look like? Here’s a demo featuring my name:

Who is personalized video right for? It often makes sense for account-based marketing strategies (both for marketing and, if relevant, onboarding).

Boston University used Vidyard to create personalized videos that encouraged people to promote their fundraising event, “Giving Day.”

Their 36,000 personalized videos resulted in a 49% open rate (more than double the average for their sector), 7% click-through rate (triple the 2.3% average), and 1,000+ donations.

Personalized videos from Vidyard will set you back at least $5,000. (You need to send an inquiry to their sales team for an exact quote.) That price might be too steep for businesses with a small budget or for those who can’t show an ROI from personalized videos.

Pricing: Don’t need personalization? Start hosting up to 20 videos on Vidyard from $150/month. This Starter plan doesn’t include integrations; you’ll need to upgrade to their Plus plan, charged at $850/month, for one integration.

Loom isn’t a “standard” video hosting platform—it’s a screensharing tool. (Only videos you’ve recorded via Loom can be uploaded to their server.)

Still, it fills some video marketing needs. For example, it was how Loom’s co-founder and CEO, Joe Thomas, responded to me when I asked for information about the platform:

The platform uses Loom’s desktop app. You can record your screen or add a voice-over or video of yourself. It’s designed for two core use cases:

Screen recordings upload automatically, and you get a link to share the video with co-workers or customers.

There are other screen recording tools that do this—most notably, Soapbox by Wistia. Loom doesn’t require an Internet browser; Soapbox, on the other hand, is a Chrome extension. Anyone using Firefox, Safari (or other browser) won’t be able to use the tool, and you’ll need a Wistia account to get started.

Adecco Group, the largest temporary staffing firm in the world, uses Loom to nurture leads. They record their screen as they talk candidates through roles they have to offer, which simplifies their process: “it’s a pain for companies to record a video and have to upload it to YouTube or send the big video file via email.”

It improved hiring, too, driving an 8X increase in applicants from 200 to 1,600 in just two weeks. Their email open rates also doubled, and they received “overwhelmingly positive feedback about the video.”

Pricing: It’s free to record and host 100 videos using Loom, but all content will be recorded in standard quality. Unlimited video storage, HD quality, and access to their editing suite is $10/month.

Do you need complete control over the videos you’re hosting? Brightcove includes:

Brightcove also integrates with many other platforms, including HubSpot, Marketo, and Oracle, which allows you to easily view, embed, and use videos from products you’re already using (rather than learning to navigate another).

Their HTML5 player offers the highest standard of video playback. That high standard, however, does require high bitrates (to avoid buffering). Whereas other platforms deliver HD video with as little as 2.8 Mbps, Brightcove recommends a stable bitrate of 10 Mbps.

Brightcove’s Players & Plugins Lounge details the extent of potential customization. Implementation is technical (i.e. developers required) but scalable.

Pricing: Brightcove doesn’t display team prices on its website. Some reviews indicate that pricing starts from $199/month, with the exact cost depending on the number of video plays. A free trial is available.

There’s no point investing in another piece of software if you can house all your content on your website, right?

HTML5 made it easier to host videos on your website. (Before, running videos directly on your site required a plugin, like Flash.) If compatibility is a concern, HTML5 video code works with the latest versions of Chrome, Explorer, Safari, and Firefox.

So why do people still pay for third-party video platforms?

As with other video hosting platforms that don’t have a native audience, self-hosted videos also miss out on the distribution network built into a site like YouTube.

Struggling to decide on which platform best suits your needs? Don’t force yourself into a box. You can optimize videos for several platforms. Few solve every challenge.

As Brodeur noted, “I’m not really a fan of any of them right now. There are features from a lot of platforms that I wish were all in one.”

Nathan Gotch, for example, uses both YouTube and Vimeo for GotchSEO’s video content:

There’s no definitive answer to “What’s the best video hosting platform?” But, generally speaking, this is what the platform-by-platform breakdown looks like:

Source: Conversionxl.com

Powered by NewsAPI.org

Keywords:

Google Videos • Key (music) • Video hosting service • YouTube • YouTube • Google Account • YouTube • Brand awareness • Web search engine • Broadcasting • Cable television • Google • YouTube • Google • Search engine optimization • YouTube • YouTube • Google • YouTube • YouTube • Mobile phone • Business and Pleasure • YouTube • YouTube • Dailymotion • Dailymotion • YouTube • United States • United States • Turkey • France • Dailymotion • SimilarWeb • Dailymotion • United States • YouTube • Dailymotion • Streaming media • Advertising • Advertising • Advertising • Consumer • Happiness • Dailymotion • Advertising • Dailymotion • Mass media • Use case • 60 Minutes • Spamming • JW Player • YouTube • JW Player • Technology • YouTube • Streaming media • JW Player • Simulcast • Facebook • JW Player • Streaming media • Facebook • HTML5 • Superfast/Mail Trains in India • JW Player • Fox Broadcasting Company • BBC • Univision • JW Player • Streaming media • Video • Wistia • Website • Website • Website • End user • Video • Landing page • YouTube • Wistia • Brand management • Wistia • Web analytics • Connect the Dots (song) • Heat map • Google Analytics • Wistia • Video • Video • YouTube • Website • Video • Wistia • Brand management • Soviet submarine S-99 • Vimeo • Website • Wistia • Paywall • Vimeo • Web search engine • David Peterson • Vimeo • HealthMarkets • Vimeo • Film • Vimeo • Vidyard • Vidyard • Arris Group • Arris Group • Vidyard • Salesforce.com • HubSpot • Marketo • Zendesk • MailChimp • Personalization • Account-based marketing • Onboarding • Boston University • Vidyard • Open rate • Click-through rate • Vidyard • Pricing • Personalization • Vidyard • Loom • Loom • Server (computing) • Jacquard loom • Chief executive officer • Joe Thomas (actor) • Information technology • Jacquard loom • Graphical user interface • Mobile app • Computer monitor • Voice-over • Video • Optical fiber • Video • Tool • Wistia • Loom • Web browser • Google Chrome extension • Firefox • Safari (web browser) • Wistia • The Adecco Group • Temporary work • Loom • YouTube • Email • Email • Open-source software • Positive feedback • Video • Free software • Server (computing) • Loom • Content (media) • Quality assurance • Video • Computer data storage • High-definition video • Brightcove • Brightcove • HubSpot • Marketo • Oracle Corporation • HTML5 • Bit rate • Data buffer • High-definition video • Data rate units • Brightcove • Bit rate • Data rate units • Brightcove • Plug-in (computing) • Technology • Internet Explorer • Software developer • Scalability • Brightcove • Website • Software • Website • Website • Plug-in (computing) • Adobe Flash • Backward compatibility • HTML5 video • Source code • Software versioning • Google Chrome • File Explorer • Safari (web browser) • Firefox • Outlook.com • Third-party software component • Video hosting service • YouTube • YouTube • Vimeo • Video hosting service •