2020 Dems reverse course to oppose virtually all Trump judicial nominees - 3 minutes read
2020 Dems reverse course to oppose virtually all Trump judicial nominees
It may come as no shock that Democratic senators currently running for president have opposed nearly all of President Trumps judicial nominees this year -- but newly reported voting data shows some of those same lawmakers backed a surprising number of the president's court picks before the election season began.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., for example, voted in favor of 46 percent of Trumps nominees from 2017-2018, according to data compiled by Demand Justice. Yet the figures, obtained and reported by Politico, show that in 2019, that number shrank to zero.
Two other 2020 candidates, Sens. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., also rejected every single one of Trumps picks this year, when in previous years they each approved 47 percent.
"Theyve lost their minds," Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, told Politico. "Its just reflexive so I dont think its any reflection on the nominees in particular. Theyre just opposed to anything and everything the president is for."
Even those who approved the majority of the presidents judicial nominees during the first two years of his term have reversed course. While Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., approved 64 percent of Trumps picks in past years, this year saw just a 3 percent approval rate. Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., went from 51 percent down to 6 percent. Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., had approved almost half in the past, at 49 percent, and stands at 11 percent this year.
Gayle Trotter, spokesperson for the conservative Judicial Crisis Network, said this trend against approving Trump's nominees "isn't going to play well" for Democrats in 2020.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
Source: Freerepublic.com
Powered by NewsAPI.org
Keywords:
Democratic Party (United States) • Federal judiciary of the United States • Nomination • Democracy • United States Senate • Marco Rubio presidential campaign, 2016 • Donald Trump • Judiciary • Voting • Elizabeth Warren • Donald Trump • Politico • Strategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence • Bernie Sanders • Vermont • Kirsten Gillibrand • Donald Trump • Mitt Romney presidential campaign, 2012 • United States Senate • John Cornyn • Texas • Politico • President of the United States • President of the United States • Federal judiciary of the United States • United States Senate • Amy Klobuchar • United States District Court for the District of Minnesota • Donald Trump • United States Senate • Kamala Harris • United States Senate • Cory Booker • Conservatism • Judicial Crisis Network • Bandwagon effect • Donald Trump • Candidate • Democracy • Free Republic • Individual • Freedom of speech • Free Republic • Copyright • Fair use • Work of art •
It may come as no shock that Democratic senators currently running for president have opposed nearly all of President Trumps judicial nominees this year -- but newly reported voting data shows some of those same lawmakers backed a surprising number of the president's court picks before the election season began.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., for example, voted in favor of 46 percent of Trumps nominees from 2017-2018, according to data compiled by Demand Justice. Yet the figures, obtained and reported by Politico, show that in 2019, that number shrank to zero.
Two other 2020 candidates, Sens. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., also rejected every single one of Trumps picks this year, when in previous years they each approved 47 percent.
"Theyve lost their minds," Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, told Politico. "Its just reflexive so I dont think its any reflection on the nominees in particular. Theyre just opposed to anything and everything the president is for."
Even those who approved the majority of the presidents judicial nominees during the first two years of his term have reversed course. While Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., approved 64 percent of Trumps picks in past years, this year saw just a 3 percent approval rate. Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., went from 51 percent down to 6 percent. Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., had approved almost half in the past, at 49 percent, and stands at 11 percent this year.
Gayle Trotter, spokesperson for the conservative Judicial Crisis Network, said this trend against approving Trump's nominees "isn't going to play well" for Democrats in 2020.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
Source: Freerepublic.com
Powered by NewsAPI.org
Keywords:
Democratic Party (United States) • Federal judiciary of the United States • Nomination • Democracy • United States Senate • Marco Rubio presidential campaign, 2016 • Donald Trump • Judiciary • Voting • Elizabeth Warren • Donald Trump • Politico • Strategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence • Bernie Sanders • Vermont • Kirsten Gillibrand • Donald Trump • Mitt Romney presidential campaign, 2012 • United States Senate • John Cornyn • Texas • Politico • President of the United States • President of the United States • Federal judiciary of the United States • United States Senate • Amy Klobuchar • United States District Court for the District of Minnesota • Donald Trump • United States Senate • Kamala Harris • United States Senate • Cory Booker • Conservatism • Judicial Crisis Network • Bandwagon effect • Donald Trump • Candidate • Democracy • Free Republic • Individual • Freedom of speech • Free Republic • Copyright • Fair use • Work of art •