Feminism is rising above the capitalism that exploits it - 6 minutes read
Feminism is rising above the capitalism that exploits it — Quartz
People love to declare the end of feminism. Some recent accusations are that feminism has “sold-out,” been colonized by corporations and lost touch with its wider social change objectives. But we say: feminism, and the feminists within the movements, are cleverer than that. They are using new corporate spaces and agendas to mobilize people to push back against gender inequality and secure a better world for all.
Yes, businesses appear to be using feminism as another marketing tool. And questions also arise about how global supply chains exploit the women workers who produce items like roses, sold at Valentine’s Day, largely to women. Truly, business has capitalized on women’s labor, beyond simply paying them less.
This means that corporations are ripe for critique from feminists. But it doesn’t mean that, in the words of feminist academic Nancy Fraser, feminism has become “capitalism’s handmaiden.”
In some of our new research, we show how feminist activists are fighting back and finding new avenues for activism in neoliberal times. The fact is that in the last 20 years, governments have ceded a great deal of power to corporations. This means feminists must navigate the power of the market, as well as targeting political change.
Feminist groups are infiltrating the political spaces where corporations, as well as governments, make the rules. For example, a constellation of feminist NGOs and grassroots groups tirelessly campaigned to get the UN’s International Labour Organization to recognize and regulate against gender-based violence and harassment—as a workplace issue. In June they won, creating the first international standard of this kind.
Women’s NGOs also helped develop newly released UN guidance on business and human rights that takes into account how women and girls are disproportionately affected by certain business activities. These norms play an important role in demanding minimum expectations around business behavior across the globe—and feminists were there to shape them.
Another way that feminists are working with the world’s current reality is as “elite allies”. Think of the late Anita Roddick, founder and former CEO of The Body Shop, who campaigned alongside the charity Women’s Aid against domestic violence. As well as raising huge amounts of money to help women facing violence, she raised awareness of the issue. Feminists working within big businesses also have an important role to play in shaping their policies and pushing for greater gender equality.
Similarly, feminist city workers joined forces with The Fawcett Society, a group which campaigns for gender equality, to fight the encroachment of the sex industry into their working lives. This is not the individualism of “Lean In.” Here, women city workers team up to fight a more systemic issue of sexist business entertainment being the norm in their industry. It was elite allies in the city that made this successful.
Feminist movements are also mobilizing in new ways, using the internet to connect and support each other. For example the small, UK-based NGO Women Working Worldwide (WWW) has worked with women’s networks in Central America, Africa and across Asia to help improve working conditions. International collaboration between women’s NGOs enabled WWW to take reports of the grievances of Kenyan women workers direct to UK buyers. This is significant when a fundamental feature of the neoliberal times we live in are multi-national companies operating with global supply chains.
Activist groups, such as No More Page 3, fighting against the sexual objectification of women in mass media, mobilized supporters to tweet and message supermarkets that continued to stock the The Sun newspaper until it removed its topless models feature. By using social media to reach new audiences, and create a tsunami effect of action, feminists are using the internet strategically to contest business practice in new and international ways.
Finally, feminist movements have been accused of being co-opted by business interests. Yet we found evidence of ways in which feminists are co-opting business interests in gender equality in order to advance an explicitly feminist agenda.
This can be seen in the way that businesses must display their corporate social responsibility (CSR) credentials. Some say CSR is used by companies to deflect criticism, but we found numerous ways that feminist groups use CSR to advance their own agendas, with CSR initiatives of most companies increasingly referencing gender equality in some way.
The arguments about the future of feminism will rage on. But our call is for critiques to remain engaged in the world in which we now live. Feminist movements have, and will have to, continue finding strategies to promote their gender justice agendas within new configurations of global power and influence.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Source: Qz.com
Powered by NewsAPI.org
Keywords:
Feminism • Capitalism • Quartz (publication) • Feminism • Feminism • Corporation • Social change • Goal • Feminism • Feminism • Social movement • Corporation • Person • Gender inequality • Business • Feminism • Globalization • Supply chain • Woman • Workforce • Valentine's Day • Labour economics • Feminism • Feminism • Academy (educational institution) • Nancy Fraser • Feminism • Capitalism • Handmaiden • Scientific method • Feminism • Activism • Activism • Neoliberalism • Government • Power (social and political) • Corporation • Feminism • Power (social and political) • Market (economics) • Social change • Feminism • Social group • Corporation • Government • Norm (social) • Satellite constellation • Feminism • Non-governmental organization • Grassroots • Social group • United Nations • International Labour Organization • Violence against women • Sexual harassment • Employment • Child • International Organization for Standardization • Women's rights • Non-governmental organization • United Nations • Business • Human rights • Girl • Norm (social) • Behavior • Feminism • Feminism • Reality • Anita Roddick • Chief executive officer • The Body Shop • Charitable organization • Women's Aid Federation of England • Domestic violence • Money • Feminism • Public policy • Gender equality • Feminism • Workforce • Fawcett Society • Social group • Gender equality • Sex industry • Individualism • Woman • Workforce • Child • Sexism • Business • Entertainment • Norm (social) • Industry • Elite • Feminist movement • Internet • Non-governmental organization • Central America • Africa • Asia • Women's rights • Non-governmental organization • Neoliberalism • Multinational corporation • Company • Globalization • Activism • No More Page 3 • Sexual objectification • Mass media • Twitter • The Sun (United Kingdom) • Toplessness • Social media • 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami • Feminism • Internet • Business ethics • International law • Feminist movement • Feminism • Gender equality • Feminism • Corporate social responsibility • Corporate social responsibility • Corporate social responsibility • Corporation • Feminism • Corporate social responsibility • Corporate social responsibility • Gender equality • Argument • Feminism • Feminist movement • Gender equality • Great power • Creative Commons license •
People love to declare the end of feminism. Some recent accusations are that feminism has “sold-out,” been colonized by corporations and lost touch with its wider social change objectives. But we say: feminism, and the feminists within the movements, are cleverer than that. They are using new corporate spaces and agendas to mobilize people to push back against gender inequality and secure a better world for all.
Yes, businesses appear to be using feminism as another marketing tool. And questions also arise about how global supply chains exploit the women workers who produce items like roses, sold at Valentine’s Day, largely to women. Truly, business has capitalized on women’s labor, beyond simply paying them less.
This means that corporations are ripe for critique from feminists. But it doesn’t mean that, in the words of feminist academic Nancy Fraser, feminism has become “capitalism’s handmaiden.”
In some of our new research, we show how feminist activists are fighting back and finding new avenues for activism in neoliberal times. The fact is that in the last 20 years, governments have ceded a great deal of power to corporations. This means feminists must navigate the power of the market, as well as targeting political change.
Feminist groups are infiltrating the political spaces where corporations, as well as governments, make the rules. For example, a constellation of feminist NGOs and grassroots groups tirelessly campaigned to get the UN’s International Labour Organization to recognize and regulate against gender-based violence and harassment—as a workplace issue. In June they won, creating the first international standard of this kind.
Women’s NGOs also helped develop newly released UN guidance on business and human rights that takes into account how women and girls are disproportionately affected by certain business activities. These norms play an important role in demanding minimum expectations around business behavior across the globe—and feminists were there to shape them.
Another way that feminists are working with the world’s current reality is as “elite allies”. Think of the late Anita Roddick, founder and former CEO of The Body Shop, who campaigned alongside the charity Women’s Aid against domestic violence. As well as raising huge amounts of money to help women facing violence, she raised awareness of the issue. Feminists working within big businesses also have an important role to play in shaping their policies and pushing for greater gender equality.
Similarly, feminist city workers joined forces with The Fawcett Society, a group which campaigns for gender equality, to fight the encroachment of the sex industry into their working lives. This is not the individualism of “Lean In.” Here, women city workers team up to fight a more systemic issue of sexist business entertainment being the norm in their industry. It was elite allies in the city that made this successful.
Feminist movements are also mobilizing in new ways, using the internet to connect and support each other. For example the small, UK-based NGO Women Working Worldwide (WWW) has worked with women’s networks in Central America, Africa and across Asia to help improve working conditions. International collaboration between women’s NGOs enabled WWW to take reports of the grievances of Kenyan women workers direct to UK buyers. This is significant when a fundamental feature of the neoliberal times we live in are multi-national companies operating with global supply chains.
Activist groups, such as No More Page 3, fighting against the sexual objectification of women in mass media, mobilized supporters to tweet and message supermarkets that continued to stock the The Sun newspaper until it removed its topless models feature. By using social media to reach new audiences, and create a tsunami effect of action, feminists are using the internet strategically to contest business practice in new and international ways.
Finally, feminist movements have been accused of being co-opted by business interests. Yet we found evidence of ways in which feminists are co-opting business interests in gender equality in order to advance an explicitly feminist agenda.
This can be seen in the way that businesses must display their corporate social responsibility (CSR) credentials. Some say CSR is used by companies to deflect criticism, but we found numerous ways that feminist groups use CSR to advance their own agendas, with CSR initiatives of most companies increasingly referencing gender equality in some way.
The arguments about the future of feminism will rage on. But our call is for critiques to remain engaged in the world in which we now live. Feminist movements have, and will have to, continue finding strategies to promote their gender justice agendas within new configurations of global power and influence.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Source: Qz.com
Powered by NewsAPI.org
Keywords:
Feminism • Capitalism • Quartz (publication) • Feminism • Feminism • Corporation • Social change • Goal • Feminism • Feminism • Social movement • Corporation • Person • Gender inequality • Business • Feminism • Globalization • Supply chain • Woman • Workforce • Valentine's Day • Labour economics • Feminism • Feminism • Academy (educational institution) • Nancy Fraser • Feminism • Capitalism • Handmaiden • Scientific method • Feminism • Activism • Activism • Neoliberalism • Government • Power (social and political) • Corporation • Feminism • Power (social and political) • Market (economics) • Social change • Feminism • Social group • Corporation • Government • Norm (social) • Satellite constellation • Feminism • Non-governmental organization • Grassroots • Social group • United Nations • International Labour Organization • Violence against women • Sexual harassment • Employment • Child • International Organization for Standardization • Women's rights • Non-governmental organization • United Nations • Business • Human rights • Girl • Norm (social) • Behavior • Feminism • Feminism • Reality • Anita Roddick • Chief executive officer • The Body Shop • Charitable organization • Women's Aid Federation of England • Domestic violence • Money • Feminism • Public policy • Gender equality • Feminism • Workforce • Fawcett Society • Social group • Gender equality • Sex industry • Individualism • Woman • Workforce • Child • Sexism • Business • Entertainment • Norm (social) • Industry • Elite • Feminist movement • Internet • Non-governmental organization • Central America • Africa • Asia • Women's rights • Non-governmental organization • Neoliberalism • Multinational corporation • Company • Globalization • Activism • No More Page 3 • Sexual objectification • Mass media • Twitter • The Sun (United Kingdom) • Toplessness • Social media • 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami • Feminism • Internet • Business ethics • International law • Feminist movement • Feminism • Gender equality • Feminism • Corporate social responsibility • Corporate social responsibility • Corporate social responsibility • Corporation • Feminism • Corporate social responsibility • Corporate social responsibility • Gender equality • Argument • Feminism • Feminist movement • Gender equality • Great power • Creative Commons license •