IMF fiscal affairs deputy director and report co-author Era Dabla-Norris told the Financial Times that a shift to a more AI-powered economy "could be painful for workers."

"You want to be able to cushion this costly transition and maintain social cohesion in societies," she said.

The authors also note that many corporate tax incentives already encourage the displacement of workers, even as many countries rely more on taxes on labor than they do on the taxation of capital.

In January, IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva predicted that AI will affect roughly 40% of jobs worldwide, with the figure reaching up to 60% in advanced economies.

To get generative AI's interpretation of the report, we uploaded a PDF of the document to the GPT-4o model and used the following simple prompt:

Please summarize this note from the IMF and highlight the most significant takeaways. Here's what ChatGPT said:

The IMF Staff Discussion Note titled "Broadening the Gains from Generative AI: The Role of Fiscal Policies" explores the significant potential and challenges posed by generative artificial intelligence (gen AI). Here are the most significant takeaways:

Key Points: 1. Potential of Gen AI: Gen AI can substantially boost productivity and transform public service delivery, enhancing sectors like healthcare, education, public procurement, and social transfers.It offers significant opportunities for both businesses and governments, including cost savings, new revenue streams, and improved public service efficiency. 2. Challenges and Risks: Unlike previous disruptive technologies, gen AI's rapid diffusion could cause massive labor disruptions, affecting both low- and high-skilled jobs.This technology may exacerbate income and wealth inequality, as it could lead to job losses in cognitive occupations and further reduce the labor share in national income. 3. Fiscal Policy Recommendations: Tax Policies:Special taxes on AI to reduce investment speed are not recommended due to operational difficulties and potential harm to productivity growth.Existing corporate tax incentives that favor rapid labor displacement should be reconsidered.General capital income taxes, which have declined over decades, should be strengthened to protect the tax base and address rising wealth inequality.Social Protection Systems:Social protection systems should be expanded to cushion the negative labor market effects of gen AI.Policies should include more generous and portable unemployment insurance, wage insurance, and active labor market policies to help workers transition and adapt.Education and training programs need to focus on lifelong learning and sector-based training to prepare workers for future jobs.Public Funding:Public investment should focus on fundamental research, necessary infrastructure, and public sector applications of AI, particularly in education and healthcare. 4. Agile Policymaking: Policymakers should adopt an agile approach to handle both routine and highly disruptive scenarios brought by gen AI.Fiscal policies should steer AI innovation and deployment to maximize societal benefits while cushioning transition costs and preventing rising inequality. 5. Impact on Inequality: The note emphasizes the potential of gen AI to reinforce market power for dominant firms, leading to increased economic rents and more unequal distribution of capital income.Policies should aim to mitigate these effects by ensuring a more equitable distribution of the gains from AI. Conclusion:

The note concludes that while generative AI holds the promise of transformative productivity gains, it also presents significant risks of labor market disruptions and increased inequality. Fiscal policies must be carefully designed to support social protection systems, reconsider corporate tax incentives, and strengthen capital income taxation to ensure a more equitable distribution of the benefits from AI advancements. Policymakers must remain flexible and prepared for both incremental and highly disruptive impacts of gen AI.