How John Bolton just put the squeeze on Mitch McConnell over impeachment

(CNN)Former national security adviser John Bolton's surprise announcement Monday that he is willing to testify in the Senate's impeachment trial significantly raises the already massive stakes of the pending votes in the chamber as to how the trial of President Donald Trump will be conducted. And it puts even more pressure on Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell as he seeks to keep his 52 GOP colleagues in line as both sides prepare for the historic proceeding.

At the core of the debate over how the Senate impeachment trial will work is whether or not witnesses will be allowed to be called. In mid-December, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer sent a letter to McConnell requesting that four witnesses be allowed to testify -- a list that included Bolton as well as acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney.

But here's the catch: The rules of how a Senate trial will work -- with regard to calling witnesses and all the rest -- are determined by the Senate. In the last impeachment trial -- for Bill Clinton in January 1999 -- the rules package governing how the trial would proceed was approved 100-0. (Three witnesses were allowed to testify in that trial.) While McConnell has signaled that he will try to negotiate a deal with Schumer over the rules, it's hard to see how the two will find common ground -- especially over the question of witnesses.

All of which means that there will be a battle royale between the two leaders -- as Schumer seeks to lure four Republican senators to support his push for witnesses while McConnell tries to keep a majority in support of holding the line.

told a local radio stationcriticizedhe told The Washington Post Prior to Bolton's announcement Monday, there were only small cracks in that Republican unity. Maine Sen. Susan Collins told a local radio station on New Year's Eve that she was "open to witnesses," before adding: "I think it's premature to decide who should be called until we see the evidence that is presented and get the answers to the questions that we senators can submit through the chief justice to both sides." Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski criticized McConnell for his coordination with the White House on impeachment but didn't come out directly in support of calling witnesses. And Utah Sen. Mitt Romney, a frequent critic of Trump, was noncommittal last month when asked whether he supported the calling of witnesses. "It's not that I don't have any point of view; it's just that I'm not willing to share that point of view till I've had the chance to talk to others and get their perspectives," he told The Washington Post

according to former National Security Council staffer Fiona Hill Bolton's willingness to testify could very well change that math for McConnell. After all, Bolton, serving as national security adviser, was right in the heart of the administration's action toward Ukraine -- he was in that role when Trump spoke with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in July 2019 and asked for the foreign leader to look into debunked allegations of wrongdoing by former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter. And it was Bolton who, according to former National Security Council staffer Fiona Hill , told her that he was "not part of whatever drug deal [US Ambassador to the European Union Gordon] Sondland and Mulvaney are cooking up." (Hill testified to that under oath during the House impeachment hearings.)

In short: It's not much of a leap to assume that Bolton could shed light on the question at the heart of the impeachment trial: Was Trump, in asking Zelensky for an investigation into a possible 2020 rival, using his office for personal and political gain? Or was he simply acting to protect American interests -- and money -- abroad?

What we don't know is this: Does the possibility of Bolton testifying change the minds of Republican senators? (Remember that only four would need to side with Democrats in order for witnesses to be called.) Or can McConnell, who has proven over the past several decades to be one of the most able persuaders in American politics (witness Collins' support for Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh), settle the undoubtedly jangled nerves within his conference in the wake of this Bolton stunner?

Source: CNN

Powered by NewsAPI.org

Keywords:

John R. Bolton • Mitch McConnell • CNN • National Security Advisor (United States) • John R. Bolton • United States Senate • Impeachment of Bill Clinton • Donald Trump • United States Senate • Majority leader • Mitch McConnell • Republican Party (United States) • United States Senate • Impeachment • United States Senate • Party leaders of the United States House of Representatives • Chuck Schumer • Mitch McConnell • Acting white • White House Chief of Staff • Mick Mulvaney • United States Senate • United States Senate • Impeachment of Bill Clinton • Bill Clinton • United States House Committee on Rules • Three Witnesses • Mitch McConnell • Battle royal (professional wrestling) • Republican Party (United States) • United States Senate • Mitch McConnell • The Washington Post • Bolton, Massachusetts • Maine Republican Party • Unity, Maine • United States Senate • Susan Collins • Radio broadcasting • New Year's Eve • United States Senate • Chief Justice of the United States • Alaska • United States Senate • Lisa Murkowski • Mitch McConnell • White House • Impeachment in the United States • Utah • United States Senate • Mitt Romney • Donald Trump • The Washington Post • United States National Security Council • Fiona Hill • Mitch McConnell • National Security Advisor (United States) • Ukraine • Donald Trump • Ukraine • Joe Biden • United States National Security Council • Fiona Hill • Illegal drug trade • Ambassador • European Union • Bolton, Connecticut • Americans • Bolton, Connecticut • Republican Party (United States) • Democratic Party (United States) • The Persuaders! • Politics of the United States • Brett Kavanaugh • Bolton • Stunner (professional wrestling) •