Lion King 2019 vs. the original: whats better and worse about the remake - 12 minutes read
whats better and worse about the remake
Its Simba (from the 2019 Lion King remake)! Disney
In 1994, Disney released an animated movie with the makings of a Shakespearean drama. It was a movie about succession, monarchies, sex, death, and nihilism all wrapped around the story of large felines, warthogs, meerkats, and the Circle of Life. Called The Lion King, it became one of Disneys most beloved animated features of all time.
Now, 25 years later, Disney has remade the classic with its sights set on the coup of a century: an attempt to remake the movie and cash in on that nostalgia.
While the new Lion King will most likely make piles of money (thanks to heavy marketing, existing fan nostalgia, and a savvy Beyoncé casting), creating a movie that bests the beloved original is easier said than done. And, according to film critics, Disney failed to do so The Lion Kings 2019 iteration has received mixed to low marks across the board.
The Lion King remake failed to match up with its predecessor in a lot of ways. That said, there are at least some parts of the remake that surpass the original. Here are nine integral components of The Lion King, and our definitive opinions on which version served them better. 1) Simba: draw
This may be a controversial opinion, but here it goes: Simba, the protagonist, is the least compelling character in The Lion King. For the most part, he just follows what the other animals Mufasa, Scar, Timon, Pumbaa, Nala, Rafiki tell him to do. His big personal revelation is to just ... follow what his father told him all along.
Perhaps thats why Matthew Brodericks Simba (from the 1994 version of the film) isnt as iconic as Jeremy Ironss Scar or James Earl Joness Mufasa. It may also be why Donald Glovers Simba in 2019s edition fails to leave much of an impression. In both versions, the other characters grab the spotlight, particularly Timon and Pumbaa (more on this in a bit), and neither Glover nor Broderick can ever outshine them. Glover has the better-suited voice in Can You Feel, sure. But this ones a push. 2) Timon and Pumbaa: the 2019 Lion King
Admittedly, some things about Simbas best pals/adoptive parents Timon and Pumbaa have changed for the worse, between 1994 and 2019. Pumbaas fart jokes have been amped up, which has the unfortunate effect of making them less funny. And whereas the pairs hakuna matata philosophy made them seem sort of like charming stoners in the 1994 version, now theyre more like checked-out narcissists, the sort that kind of just land on being libertarians because they think its the political philosophy that interferes least with their life. (Remember, Lion King is political, folks.)
However. However. By the time Timon and Pumbaa showed up during Lion King 2019, about halfway through the film, I was so relieved to see them. The pair suddenly inject some levity into a movie thats gotten very, very dark Mufasa has just died, and Simba is in despair and while Seth Rogens voice turns out to be an eerily good fit for a warthog, it is Billy Eichner who steals the entire show as Timon. The comedians signature yell-shout cadence, honed to such perfection in Difficult People and Billy on the Street, seemingly finds its apex in the body of a weird little meerkat. Its glorious. Thank you, Billy. 3) Scar (and Mufasa): draw
James Earl Joness Mufasa and Mufasas menacing brother Scar, played by Irons in the original and Chiwetel Ejiofor in the remake, are by far the best characters of both versions of The Lion King.
While Joness Mufasa is more or less a reprise, Ejiofors Scar is very different from Ironss. Ironss Scar possessed a blush of camp and sinuous smoothness to go along with his Machiavellian ways. Ejiofors take is more menacing, and his origin story has been tweaked to include that he not only believes himself to be the rightful king but he even once challenged Mufasa for the crown and lost. Ejiofor is angrier, more malevolent, and more terrifying than Irons, whose Scar has more charisma and more megalomania. Different they may be, they have one big thing in common: Both are the best things of their respective movies. 4) Visuals: the 2019 Lion King
Hands down, the Lion King remake is one of the most beautiful movies to come out in 2019 thus far. It looks like the best nature documentary ever made, portraying every animal with a nearly surreal level of photorealism. That said, that style doesnt always work in the movies favor, since it creates a jarring disconnect in which hyperrealistic lions sing like Beyoncé. The more impressive parts are when the visuals can stand on their own without the Disney songs, like the earth-shaking avalanche of wildebeests in the stampede scene, or how terrifying it is when Shenzi the hyenas jaws turn from smile into a meat-shearing grin. 5) The Circle of Life: draw
The Circle of Life opens both movies, with the whole savannah gathering to watch the young Simba be scooped up by Rafiki and crowned (figuratively) the next king. Its a pretty stirring sequence, with lyrics and music by Tim Rice and Elton John, and the song functions as an overture to the whole operatic journey that is The Lion King.
And as it turns out, Disney decided not to mess with a good thing. The 2019 Circle of Life (sung by Lindiwe Mkhize, who performed as Rafiki in the London stage version of The Lion King for 13 years) is almost a shot-for-shot remake of the original, though of course now its photorealistic. Some of the new movies best images (of sunsets and running animals and so on) appear in this sequence, and the song is just as heartfelt as the original. 6) Be Prepared: the Original Lion King
There was a rumor earlier this year that Disney was cutting Be Prepared, Scars classic and iconic villain song, from the movie to make room for at least one new Beyoncé song. Then, closer to the films release, the soundtrack included a song called Be Prepared (2019), which did make its way into the film. Unfortunately, it wouldve been better if Be Prepared (2019) had been cut.
Granted, Disney and director Jon Favreau wanted to make Scar more menacing, and they did by using Ejiofors bass drum voice. It wouldnt make sense for 2019s Scar to have a campy solo, so Disney tweaked the song, removing the theatrics and humor and making it sound more like a battle cry. The result is something thats neither committed to its melodrama nor intimidating enough to be menacing a floundering, forgettable song.
The original Be Prepared, sung-talked by Jeremy Irons and peppered with vocal jolts of Whoopi Goldberg and Cheech Marin, is the winner here, and it isnt even close. Ironss velvet vocals are a character of their own, sharpening into a fang-bearing growl (You wont get sniff without me!) in perfect moments. Ironss voice is key to making the song a crystallization of Scars myopic, grand ambition there are several references to coups, succession, and injustice.
Scars a character whos obsessed with not only ruling but doing so in the most outsize fashion. And the original Be Prepared, complete with marching hyenas that would make dear leaders so very happy, gets at that perfectly. 7) Can You Feel the Love Tonight?: the Original Lion King
For practical purposes, lets remember this is a song about horny lions. Simba and Nala, having gone through lion puberty, are now adult lions. And after having sniffed and pinned each other in the oasis, they burst into this song about the calm evening and the antsy sexual tension thats emerging between them.
As a song on its own and not attached to hormone-ravaged young adult lions, Donald Glover and Beyoncés version soars. But in the context of the movie, the original did the better job of selling it.
The hyperrealistic visuals of the 2019 version make the sequence feel like youre watching these real lions frolic and sing this song to one another. It doesnt work were never taken out of the faux realism long enough to stomach this lion love song. The animated version succeeds in asking you to suspend reality, which helps us appreciate anthropomorphic lions giving bedroom eyes and serenade each other with a horny melody. 8) The comedy: draw
There are plenty of laugh-out-loud moments in the new Lion King. But apart from the humor of watching Billy Eichners voice come out of Timons body, the comedy is largely drawn from the original versions script. Theres little that might surprise an audience as a new, funny take on an old story. It just feels like sitting through the same old story again, comedic beats and all.
While comedy isnt a primary aim of The Lion King (in contrast to campier films like The Little Mermaid or even Aladdin), its even less prevalent here for most of the main scenes. But whenever Timon and Pumbaa are around, they kick up the laughs a notch. And in the end, both Lion King movies comedy more or less stands on an equal level. 9) The movie as a whole: the original Lion King
As noted in our review, the new Lion King isnt a complete wash. Its interesting to see Disney playing with new technologies (even if it seems as if the studio might be trying to make animation so photorealistic that it can just quit hiring live actors altogether at some point in the future). Some of the voice acting is great. And the material is so appealing, its basically timeless; you cant screw it up too badly.
But on the whole, it seems clear that the 1994 version still stands head and shoulders above its younger cousin. Its inventive and imaginative. The songs were written for that film, and the animations that accompany them are often whimsical and visually inventive in the way that only hand-drawn animation, which lets the imagination of the audience fly free, can do. And thats especially important in a movie about talking, singing wild animals.
Theres little doubt that many audiences, especially hardcore Lion King fans, will find the new version charming, like a really faithful cover album of a beloved record. But in the end, its sad to see Disney shed the hand-drawn glory of its former days. Nobody, after all, really needs a documentary about lions, but with lip-syncing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
Source: Freerepublic.com
Powered by NewsAPI.org
Keywords:
Remake • Simba • The Lion King • Remake • The Walt Disney Company • The Walt Disney Company • William Shakespeare • Sexual intercourse • Death • Nihilism • Felidae • Common warthog • Meerkat • Circle of Life • The Lion King • The Walt Disney Company • Animation • The Walt Disney Company • Nostalgia • The Lion King • Nostalgia • Beyoncé • The Walt Disney Company • The Lion King • The Lion King • The Lion King • Simba • Simba • Protagonist • The Lion King • Scar (The Lion King) • Timon & Pumbaa (TV series) • Nala (The Lion King) • Matthew Broderick • Simba • Jeremy Irons • Scar (The Lion King) • James Earl Jones • Donald Glover • Simba • Timon and Pumbaa • Donald Glover • Donald Glover • Timon and Pumbaa • The Lion King • Simba • Timon and Pumbaa • Hakuna Matata (song) • Philosophy • Narcissism • Libertarianism • Political philosophy • The Lion King • Timon and Pumbaa • The Lion King • Film • Film • Simba • Seth Rogen • Phacochoerus • Billy Eichner • Timon and Pumbaa • Comedy • Cadence (music) • Difficult People • Billy on the Street • Meerkat • James Earl Jones • Scar (The Lion King) • Jeremy Irons • Chiwetel Ejiofor • Remake • The Lion King • Chuck Jones • Reprise • Scar (The Lion King) • Jeremy Irons • Jeremy Irons • Scar (The Lion King) • Machiavellianism • Narcissistic personality disorder • The Lion King • The Lion King • Cover version • Nature documentary • Surrealism • Photorealism • Hyperreality • Beyoncé • The Walt Disney Company • Avalanche • Wildebeest • Hyena • Jaws (film) • Circle of Life • Circle of Life • Savannah, Georgia • Simba • Lyrics • Music • Tim Rice • Elton John • Song • Overture • Opera • The Lion King • The Walt Disney Company • Circle of Life • London • The Lion King • Shot-for-shot • Remake • Photorealism • The Lion King • The Walt Disney Company • Scar (The Lion King) • Film • Beyoncé • Song • Film • Soundtrack • Film • The Walt Disney Company • Jon Favreau • Scar (The Lion King) • Bass drum • Camp (style) • The Walt Disney Company • Battle Cry (film) • Melodrama • Jeremy Irons • Whoopi Goldberg • Cheech Marin • Singing • Without Me • Perfect Moments • Crystallization • Near-sightedness • Can You Feel the Love Tonight • The Lion King • Sexual arousal • Simba • Nala (The Lion King) • Puberty • Oasis (band) • Hormone • Donald Glover • Beyoncé • Hyperreality • Realism (arts) • Lion • Anthropomorphism • Lion • Bedroom Eyes (film) • Melody • The Lion King • The Simpsons • Billy Eichner • Timon and Pumbaa • Comedy • Dubbing (filmmaking) • Audience • Comedy • Comedy • The Lion King • The Little Mermaid (1989 film) • Aladdin (1992 Disney film) • Timon and Pumbaa • The Lion King • Comedy • The Lion King • The Lion King • The Walt Disney Company • Animation • Photorealism • Voice acting • Materialism • Film • Animation • Traditional animation • Film • The Lion King • Cover version • Cover version • The Walt Disney Company • Lip sync • Free Republic • Free Republic • Copyright • Fair use • Work of art •
Its Simba (from the 2019 Lion King remake)! Disney
In 1994, Disney released an animated movie with the makings of a Shakespearean drama. It was a movie about succession, monarchies, sex, death, and nihilism all wrapped around the story of large felines, warthogs, meerkats, and the Circle of Life. Called The Lion King, it became one of Disneys most beloved animated features of all time.
Now, 25 years later, Disney has remade the classic with its sights set on the coup of a century: an attempt to remake the movie and cash in on that nostalgia.
While the new Lion King will most likely make piles of money (thanks to heavy marketing, existing fan nostalgia, and a savvy Beyoncé casting), creating a movie that bests the beloved original is easier said than done. And, according to film critics, Disney failed to do so The Lion Kings 2019 iteration has received mixed to low marks across the board.
The Lion King remake failed to match up with its predecessor in a lot of ways. That said, there are at least some parts of the remake that surpass the original. Here are nine integral components of The Lion King, and our definitive opinions on which version served them better. 1) Simba: draw
This may be a controversial opinion, but here it goes: Simba, the protagonist, is the least compelling character in The Lion King. For the most part, he just follows what the other animals Mufasa, Scar, Timon, Pumbaa, Nala, Rafiki tell him to do. His big personal revelation is to just ... follow what his father told him all along.
Perhaps thats why Matthew Brodericks Simba (from the 1994 version of the film) isnt as iconic as Jeremy Ironss Scar or James Earl Joness Mufasa. It may also be why Donald Glovers Simba in 2019s edition fails to leave much of an impression. In both versions, the other characters grab the spotlight, particularly Timon and Pumbaa (more on this in a bit), and neither Glover nor Broderick can ever outshine them. Glover has the better-suited voice in Can You Feel, sure. But this ones a push. 2) Timon and Pumbaa: the 2019 Lion King
Admittedly, some things about Simbas best pals/adoptive parents Timon and Pumbaa have changed for the worse, between 1994 and 2019. Pumbaas fart jokes have been amped up, which has the unfortunate effect of making them less funny. And whereas the pairs hakuna matata philosophy made them seem sort of like charming stoners in the 1994 version, now theyre more like checked-out narcissists, the sort that kind of just land on being libertarians because they think its the political philosophy that interferes least with their life. (Remember, Lion King is political, folks.)
However. However. By the time Timon and Pumbaa showed up during Lion King 2019, about halfway through the film, I was so relieved to see them. The pair suddenly inject some levity into a movie thats gotten very, very dark Mufasa has just died, and Simba is in despair and while Seth Rogens voice turns out to be an eerily good fit for a warthog, it is Billy Eichner who steals the entire show as Timon. The comedians signature yell-shout cadence, honed to such perfection in Difficult People and Billy on the Street, seemingly finds its apex in the body of a weird little meerkat. Its glorious. Thank you, Billy. 3) Scar (and Mufasa): draw
James Earl Joness Mufasa and Mufasas menacing brother Scar, played by Irons in the original and Chiwetel Ejiofor in the remake, are by far the best characters of both versions of The Lion King.
While Joness Mufasa is more or less a reprise, Ejiofors Scar is very different from Ironss. Ironss Scar possessed a blush of camp and sinuous smoothness to go along with his Machiavellian ways. Ejiofors take is more menacing, and his origin story has been tweaked to include that he not only believes himself to be the rightful king but he even once challenged Mufasa for the crown and lost. Ejiofor is angrier, more malevolent, and more terrifying than Irons, whose Scar has more charisma and more megalomania. Different they may be, they have one big thing in common: Both are the best things of their respective movies. 4) Visuals: the 2019 Lion King
Hands down, the Lion King remake is one of the most beautiful movies to come out in 2019 thus far. It looks like the best nature documentary ever made, portraying every animal with a nearly surreal level of photorealism. That said, that style doesnt always work in the movies favor, since it creates a jarring disconnect in which hyperrealistic lions sing like Beyoncé. The more impressive parts are when the visuals can stand on their own without the Disney songs, like the earth-shaking avalanche of wildebeests in the stampede scene, or how terrifying it is when Shenzi the hyenas jaws turn from smile into a meat-shearing grin. 5) The Circle of Life: draw
The Circle of Life opens both movies, with the whole savannah gathering to watch the young Simba be scooped up by Rafiki and crowned (figuratively) the next king. Its a pretty stirring sequence, with lyrics and music by Tim Rice and Elton John, and the song functions as an overture to the whole operatic journey that is The Lion King.
And as it turns out, Disney decided not to mess with a good thing. The 2019 Circle of Life (sung by Lindiwe Mkhize, who performed as Rafiki in the London stage version of The Lion King for 13 years) is almost a shot-for-shot remake of the original, though of course now its photorealistic. Some of the new movies best images (of sunsets and running animals and so on) appear in this sequence, and the song is just as heartfelt as the original. 6) Be Prepared: the Original Lion King
There was a rumor earlier this year that Disney was cutting Be Prepared, Scars classic and iconic villain song, from the movie to make room for at least one new Beyoncé song. Then, closer to the films release, the soundtrack included a song called Be Prepared (2019), which did make its way into the film. Unfortunately, it wouldve been better if Be Prepared (2019) had been cut.
Granted, Disney and director Jon Favreau wanted to make Scar more menacing, and they did by using Ejiofors bass drum voice. It wouldnt make sense for 2019s Scar to have a campy solo, so Disney tweaked the song, removing the theatrics and humor and making it sound more like a battle cry. The result is something thats neither committed to its melodrama nor intimidating enough to be menacing a floundering, forgettable song.
The original Be Prepared, sung-talked by Jeremy Irons and peppered with vocal jolts of Whoopi Goldberg and Cheech Marin, is the winner here, and it isnt even close. Ironss velvet vocals are a character of their own, sharpening into a fang-bearing growl (You wont get sniff without me!) in perfect moments. Ironss voice is key to making the song a crystallization of Scars myopic, grand ambition there are several references to coups, succession, and injustice.
Scars a character whos obsessed with not only ruling but doing so in the most outsize fashion. And the original Be Prepared, complete with marching hyenas that would make dear leaders so very happy, gets at that perfectly. 7) Can You Feel the Love Tonight?: the Original Lion King
For practical purposes, lets remember this is a song about horny lions. Simba and Nala, having gone through lion puberty, are now adult lions. And after having sniffed and pinned each other in the oasis, they burst into this song about the calm evening and the antsy sexual tension thats emerging between them.
As a song on its own and not attached to hormone-ravaged young adult lions, Donald Glover and Beyoncés version soars. But in the context of the movie, the original did the better job of selling it.
The hyperrealistic visuals of the 2019 version make the sequence feel like youre watching these real lions frolic and sing this song to one another. It doesnt work were never taken out of the faux realism long enough to stomach this lion love song. The animated version succeeds in asking you to suspend reality, which helps us appreciate anthropomorphic lions giving bedroom eyes and serenade each other with a horny melody. 8) The comedy: draw
There are plenty of laugh-out-loud moments in the new Lion King. But apart from the humor of watching Billy Eichners voice come out of Timons body, the comedy is largely drawn from the original versions script. Theres little that might surprise an audience as a new, funny take on an old story. It just feels like sitting through the same old story again, comedic beats and all.
While comedy isnt a primary aim of The Lion King (in contrast to campier films like The Little Mermaid or even Aladdin), its even less prevalent here for most of the main scenes. But whenever Timon and Pumbaa are around, they kick up the laughs a notch. And in the end, both Lion King movies comedy more or less stands on an equal level. 9) The movie as a whole: the original Lion King
As noted in our review, the new Lion King isnt a complete wash. Its interesting to see Disney playing with new technologies (even if it seems as if the studio might be trying to make animation so photorealistic that it can just quit hiring live actors altogether at some point in the future). Some of the voice acting is great. And the material is so appealing, its basically timeless; you cant screw it up too badly.
But on the whole, it seems clear that the 1994 version still stands head and shoulders above its younger cousin. Its inventive and imaginative. The songs were written for that film, and the animations that accompany them are often whimsical and visually inventive in the way that only hand-drawn animation, which lets the imagination of the audience fly free, can do. And thats especially important in a movie about talking, singing wild animals.
Theres little doubt that many audiences, especially hardcore Lion King fans, will find the new version charming, like a really faithful cover album of a beloved record. But in the end, its sad to see Disney shed the hand-drawn glory of its former days. Nobody, after all, really needs a documentary about lions, but with lip-syncing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
Source: Freerepublic.com
Powered by NewsAPI.org
Keywords:
Remake • Simba • The Lion King • Remake • The Walt Disney Company • The Walt Disney Company • William Shakespeare • Sexual intercourse • Death • Nihilism • Felidae • Common warthog • Meerkat • Circle of Life • The Lion King • The Walt Disney Company • Animation • The Walt Disney Company • Nostalgia • The Lion King • Nostalgia • Beyoncé • The Walt Disney Company • The Lion King • The Lion King • The Lion King • Simba • Simba • Protagonist • The Lion King • Scar (The Lion King) • Timon & Pumbaa (TV series) • Nala (The Lion King) • Matthew Broderick • Simba • Jeremy Irons • Scar (The Lion King) • James Earl Jones • Donald Glover • Simba • Timon and Pumbaa • Donald Glover • Donald Glover • Timon and Pumbaa • The Lion King • Simba • Timon and Pumbaa • Hakuna Matata (song) • Philosophy • Narcissism • Libertarianism • Political philosophy • The Lion King • Timon and Pumbaa • The Lion King • Film • Film • Simba • Seth Rogen • Phacochoerus • Billy Eichner • Timon and Pumbaa • Comedy • Cadence (music) • Difficult People • Billy on the Street • Meerkat • James Earl Jones • Scar (The Lion King) • Jeremy Irons • Chiwetel Ejiofor • Remake • The Lion King • Chuck Jones • Reprise • Scar (The Lion King) • Jeremy Irons • Jeremy Irons • Scar (The Lion King) • Machiavellianism • Narcissistic personality disorder • The Lion King • The Lion King • Cover version • Nature documentary • Surrealism • Photorealism • Hyperreality • Beyoncé • The Walt Disney Company • Avalanche • Wildebeest • Hyena • Jaws (film) • Circle of Life • Circle of Life • Savannah, Georgia • Simba • Lyrics • Music • Tim Rice • Elton John • Song • Overture • Opera • The Lion King • The Walt Disney Company • Circle of Life • London • The Lion King • Shot-for-shot • Remake • Photorealism • The Lion King • The Walt Disney Company • Scar (The Lion King) • Film • Beyoncé • Song • Film • Soundtrack • Film • The Walt Disney Company • Jon Favreau • Scar (The Lion King) • Bass drum • Camp (style) • The Walt Disney Company • Battle Cry (film) • Melodrama • Jeremy Irons • Whoopi Goldberg • Cheech Marin • Singing • Without Me • Perfect Moments • Crystallization • Near-sightedness • Can You Feel the Love Tonight • The Lion King • Sexual arousal • Simba • Nala (The Lion King) • Puberty • Oasis (band) • Hormone • Donald Glover • Beyoncé • Hyperreality • Realism (arts) • Lion • Anthropomorphism • Lion • Bedroom Eyes (film) • Melody • The Lion King • The Simpsons • Billy Eichner • Timon and Pumbaa • Comedy • Dubbing (filmmaking) • Audience • Comedy • Comedy • The Lion King • The Little Mermaid (1989 film) • Aladdin (1992 Disney film) • Timon and Pumbaa • The Lion King • Comedy • The Lion King • The Lion King • The Walt Disney Company • Animation • Photorealism • Voice acting • Materialism • Film • Animation • Traditional animation • Film • The Lion King • Cover version • Cover version • The Walt Disney Company • Lip sync • Free Republic • Free Republic • Copyright • Fair use • Work of art •